What is the legal basis for jail caning in Singapore?

In Singapore, jail caning is part of the penal code for various serious offenses, aimed at deterring crime. The legal framework supports this practice for its perceived effectiveness in maintaining law and order.

How does jail caning conflict with international law?

International law, specifically human rights treaties, opposes corporal punishment. Such acts are often seen as degrading and inhumane, conflicting with agreements like the Convention Against Torture.

What are the human rights criticisms regarding jail caning?

Human rights groups argue that caning causes undue physical and psychological harm, violating personal dignity and rights. They advocate for more humane and rehabilitative forms of punishment.

Has public opinion in Singapore influenced legal reform regarding caning?

Public opinion is divided, with some supporting strict punishments to maintain order, while others push for reform aligned with human rights. This duality affects the pace and nature of potential legal changes.

What international responses have emerged from the Febry Iswanto case?

International responses include condemnations from human rights bodies and calls for Singapore to reconsider its punitive measures. Such cases often lead to diplomatic dialogues and pressures for legal reform.

Law and Government

Febry Iswanto Case: Examining Legal Repercussions of Jail Caning on D

ByHuzaifa Zahoor December 19, 2025December 19, 2025

The case of Febry Iswanto, who faced jail caning in Singapore, has stirred significant legal and ethical discussions. With the punishment attracting widespread media coverage, it’s crucial to examine the implications within the context of international law and human rights. This case highlights critical issues regarding the legality and morality of such judicial punishments, sparking debate in legal circles worldwide.