Starbucks Anticipates Non-Binding Bids for China Business Within Two Weeks
China has become one of the most important markets for global brands, and Starbucks is no exception. With thousands of stores across the country, Starbucks has grown from a foreign newcomer to a household name. Coffee culture in China is changing fast, with more young people and professionals choosing cafes over instant coffee at home. Recently, they announced that they expect non-binding bids for their China business within the next two weeks. This news has grabbed the attention of investors, competitors, and consumers alike.
We can see why this is significant. Its China operations contribute a large portion of its global revenue. Any changes in ownership or partnerships could reshape the way Starbucks operates in the country. At the same time, China’s coffee market is crowded, with local players like Luckin Coffee pushing aggressive expansion strategies. Understanding why it is opening the door to bids, who might be interested, and what it means for the future is crucial for anyone following the global coffee scene.
This article will explore these questions and provide insight into what Starbucks’ next move could mean for the company and the wider market.
Background: Starbucks in China

Starbucks entered China in 1999, opening its first store in Beijing. Over the years, it expanded rapidly, becoming a significant player in China’s coffee market. By 2024, it operated 7,828 stores across 200+ cities in China, making it the company’s largest market outside the United States. Despite this extensive presence, its revenue from China has been relatively modest, contributing only about 8% to 9% of its global revenue.
Why Starbucks is Considering Bids?
The decision to seek non-binding bids for its China business stems from several challenges. Competition has intensified, with local brands like Luckin Coffee gaining significant market share. Its market share in China has declined from 34% in 2019 to 14% in 2024. Additionally, economic factors and changing consumer preferences have impacted sales.

In response, they introduced price reductions and localized products to attract customers. However, these measures have had limited success, prompting the company to explore strategic partnerships or partial divestitures to strengthen its position in the market.
The Bidding Process and Potential Suitors

Starbucks has shortlisted several potential bidders, including private equity firms such as Carlyle, EQT, Hillhouse Capital, Primavera Capital, Bain Capital, and KKR, as well as tech giant Tencent. These firms bring diverse expertise and resources, potentially offering strategic advantages to it. The bidding process began in May, with interested parties signing non-disclosure agreements and accessing financial details by July. The final structure and size of the stake to be sold are yet to be determined, indicating ongoing negotiations and considerations.
Impact on Starbucks’ Business Strategy
Engaging in this bidding process could lead to various strategic outcomes for this company. A partnership or partial sale might provide capital infusion, enabling further expansion or technological advancements in China. It could also allow them to focus on other markets while leveraging local expertise in China. However, such a move may also result in a loss of direct control over operations, necessitating careful consideration of brand alignment and operational autonomy.
Broader Implications for the Coffee Market in China
The potential restructuring of Starbucks’ operations in China could have significant implications for the broader coffee market. Local competitors like Luckin Coffee have rapidly expanded, offering lower-priced and tech-savvy alternatives that appeal to Chinese consumers.
A shift in Starbucks’ strategy might intensify competition, leading to further innovations and pricing adjustments across the industry. Additionally, such changes could influence consumer perceptions and preferences, affecting market dynamics.
Investor and Market Reactions

Investors are closely monitoring the developments surrounding Starbucks’ China business. The potential sale or partnership could impact Starbucks’ valuation and stock performance. Analysts are evaluating the long-term effects on the company’s growth prospects and market positioning. The involvement of prominent private equity firms and tech companies in the bidding process underscores the strategic importance of the Chinese market and the potential value of Starbucks’ operations there.
Challenges and Risks
Several challenges and risks accompany Starbucks’ considerations regarding its China business. Regulatory complexities and political factors in China could affect the feasibility and structure of any deal. Cultural differences and consumer behavior variations may pose integration challenges for potential partners. Additionally, maintaining brand identity and operational standards while adjusting to new ownership structures requires careful planning and execution.
Wrap Up
The exploration of non-binding bids for its China business marks a pivotal moment in the company’s global strategy. While the Chinese market remains crucial for Starbucks’ growth, the evolving competitive landscape and economic factors necessitate adaptive approaches. The outcome of this bidding process will likely shape its future in China and could serve as a case study for other multinational companies navigating similar challenges in foreign markets.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Starbucks’ “Back to Starbucks” strategy, launched in early 2025, focuses on enhancing in-store experiences, reducing wait times, and simplifying the menu to improve quality and customer satisfaction.
Analysts predict its stock price could reach approximately $90.11 by the end of 2025, reflecting modest growth amid ongoing brand revitalization efforts.
Starbucks aims to restore its brand by focusing on quality coffee, enhancing customer experiences, and simplifying operations to strengthen its position in the competitive coffee market.
Disclaimer:
This is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Always do your research.